WAParking

Regulation

Patna Parking Norms: 2014 Byelaws vs the 2026 Draft

Patna's notified byelaws set parking as a share of built-up area. The 2026 draft switches to Equivalent Car Spaces (ECS) and gives stacked mechanised parking its own, much smaller area per car.

WAParking Application Engineering 31 Oct 2026 4 min read Patna Bihar Building Byelaws parking norms ECS mechanised parking stack parking basement parking regulation
Cover graphic for Patna parking norms. It compares 32 sq m per ECS for basement parking with 16 sq m for double-stack mechanised parking under the draft Bihar Building Byelaws 2026.
Area per ECS under Table 20 of the draft Bihar Building Byelaws 2026.

Patna sits between two parking rulebooks. The notified Bihar Building Byelaws 2014 still apply. A draft Bihar Building Byelaws 2026 is out for public objections. The two measure parking differently, which matters most for mechanised parking.

The notified rule: Bye-law 40 of the 2014 byelaws

The 2014 byelaws were published in the Bihar Gazette (Extraordinary) No. 213 on 29 January 2015. Parking is covered by Bye-law 40, "Off Street Parking Space".

Table 19 does not count cars. It sets parking as a percentage of total built-up area. Bye-law 40(2) allows parking in basements, on stilts, in open areas, in multi-level parking or on commercial rooftops. Parking is not counted in FAR.

Other points in Bye-law 40:

  • Basement and upper parking floors need two ramps at least 3.6 m wide, or one ramp at least 5.4 m wide, at no steeper than 1:10 (40(8)).
  • Access "may also be accomplished through provisions of mechanical lifts" (40(8)).

The 2014 text does not define an Equivalent Car Space (ECS). It has no separate visitor-parking rule and does not mention stack or puzzle parking.

The 2026 draft: Clause 32 and ECS

The Urban Development and Housing Department's draft, posted by the Patna Metropolitan Area Authority for objections, replaces percentages with ECS. Under Clause 32(1), Table 20 gives the area of one ECS, including circulation.

Parking type 2014 byelaws (notified) 2026 draft, Table 20 (area per ECS)
Single/multi-unit plotted Not defined 13.75 sq m
Open area Not defined 23 sq m
Covered Not defined 28 sq m
Basement Not defined 32 sq m
Mechanised, double stacking Not addressed 16 sq m or as per actual design
Mechanised, triple stacking Not addressed 8 sq m or as per actual design
Two-wheeler (incl. bicycles) Not defined 2.00 sq m

A note to Table 20 says double and triple stacking "shall be allowed in basement and other areas".

How much parking is required

Use 2014, Table 19 (% of built-up area) 2026 draft, Table 21
Malls, cinemas, marriage and banquet halls 35% Not listed separately
IT/ITES, hotels, hospitals, offices, industrial, high-rise 30% Non-residential: 2.00 ECS per "100"; Industrial: 1.0 ECS per "300"
Residential, group housing, small offices up to 50 sq m 25% Residential, dwelling unit up to 100 sq m: 1.00 ECS
Public buildings Not listed separately 2.0 ECS per "100"
Stadium Not listed 1 ECS per 20 seats
Amusement parks Not listed 30% of plot area

The draft's column is headed "Area of Dwelling Unit (sq.m.)"; the basis of the non-residential rows is not spelt out.

Visitor parking

The 2014 byelaws have no visitor rule. A note under draft Table 21 adds that in residential buildings, "additional 10% parking shall also be provided for visitors".

Stilts, podiums and multi-level parking in the draft

  • Stilt parking up to 2.5 m in height is outside FAR. If the stilt is used for anything else, it counts towards FAR (32(3)).
  • A standalone multi-level parking needs a plot of at least 1,000 sq m (750 sq m in built-up areas). It gets FAR 3.0 and at most two basements (32(4)).
  • A podium may extend the stilt floor where a basement cannot be reached, after leaving a 3 m setback (32(5)).
  • Basements must be at least 2.4 m high (23(12)(3)(a)).

What this means for a mechanical parking design

  • Under the notified 2014 rule, the requirement is an area, not a car count. The text does not say how a stacker's extra cars should be credited, so agree the method with the sanctioning authority early.
  • Under the draft, a double-stack space counts at 16 sq m against 32 sq m for a conventional basement ECS. A triple stack counts at 8 sq m. On paper, the same basement area can hold two to four times as many ECS.
  • "Or based on actual design" leaves room for the authority to assess the real system layout. Be ready with system drawings, not just bay counts.
  • Basement height. The draft's 2.4 m minimum is a floor for any basement. A stacked system needs more clear height, so set floor-to-floor heights at concept stage.
  • Visitor spaces are best kept as independent bays, not inside dependent stacks.
  • Mechanical lifts. Both texts accept lifts for basement access (2014: 40(8); draft: 23(12)(3)(e)). This can save ramp area on small plots.

Caveats and what to confirm

  • The 2026 text is a draft. Figures may change before notification.
  • Amendments to the 2014 byelaws were made after 2015. We could not read them from an official source, so they are not reflected here. Check the latest UDHD notifications.
  • Confirm the basis of draft Table 21's non-residential figures, and whether residential units above 100 sq m need more than 1 ECS.
  • The draft shows both 1:10 and 1:8 for basement ramps. Confirm the final gradient.
  • Master plan, fire and heritage rules may add requirements. Confirm with the sanctioning authority before design freeze.

WAParking Application Engineering

Related reading

Related

More from Insights

Chat with us